Peer Review Process
Transparent editorial and peer review workflow
Step by Step Review Process
Author Submission
The author submits the manuscript to the journal through the official submission system.
Plagiarism and Quality Check
The editorial office screens the paper for plagiarism originality scope relevance formatting and basic academic quality.
Initial Decision
If the paper fails plagiarism or quality standards it is rejected and returned to the author. If it passes it proceeds to peer review.
Paper Sent to Reviewers
The editorial office assigns qualified reviewers and sends the manuscript for blind peer review.
Reviewers Evaluation
Reviewers assess the paper for originality methodology clarity contribution to knowledge and ethical compliance.
Review Reports Returned
Reviewers submit their evaluations and recommendations to the editorial office.
Feedback Sent to Author
The editorial office sends the reviewers comments and the original paper back to the author for revision.
Revised Paper Submission
The author revises the manuscript according to reviewers feedback and resubmits it to the editorial office.
Revised Paper Sent to Editor
The revised manuscript is forwarded to the editor for a final decision.
Editor Decision
The editor either accepts or rejects the revised paper. If rejected the paper is sent back to the author. If accepted it moves to production.
Proof Sent to Author
The publisher sends the final proof to the author for final checks and minor corrections.
Publication
After proof approval the paper is officially published in the journal.